Posts Tagged ‘planning’

“Strategic” Burntwood Land Up For Sale

June 7th, 2012

 

 

Burntwood residents will probably have noticed by now that sale signs have been erected at the edges of land bordering Hospital Road, Coppy Nook Lane and Hanney Hay Road.

Having looked at the particulars of the sale, the agents describe the land as

151.88 acres (61.46 ha) of strategic land on the edge of Burntwood and Hammerwich with long road frontages.

 

 

       

 

The land has been previously discussed in council plans for it’s potential for housing and has been assessed as “suitable” which resulted in a significant “Save Our Green Belt”  campaign (I believe the land along Farewell Lane was also part of the same campaign?).  The sale particulars make it clear that whilst it has been identified as suitable for housing with a potential yield of 500 homes, no definitive permissions or development allocations have been granted or proposed by Lichfield District Council.  Whilst that may give some comfort to those who oppose the development of housing on the land, it should concern them that whilst under current ownership there is no apparent pressure being applied whereas if the land is sold to a more aggressive, persistant and connected owner/developer, the game may change significantly.

 

Post to Twitter Post to Bebo Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Diigo Post to Facebook Post to Google Buzz

Planning: Listen To The Community?

May 26th, 2011

It seems there was a rather heated Planning Committee meeting at Lichfield District Council this week, a meeting which many have dubbed “a farce” and “a cringing embarassment”.

The meeting discussed an application for a 5-bed house, with an external quadruple garage, to be built in the garden of an existing property at Garthfell House in Quarry Hills Lane.  Residents angrily walked out of the meeting after the committee dismissed 146 letters of objection and instead approved the application.  I have not studied the application in detail and, according to the committee chairman there were no grounds to reject it, but if the governments ideas for Big Society and in particular, it’s involvement in local planning and licensing issues are ever to be taken seriously, something needs to be done about a system which can ride roughshod over the objections of 146 people in favour of a single applicant.

I notice from the bottom of the article the following statement:

Former district council planning chief Ian Thompson, who is now the chief executive of Stafford Borough Council, owns the Garthfell House site and submitted the planning application.

To those who objected to the application and in particular those who attended the meeting, that must look extremely suspicious!

Post to Twitter Post to Bebo Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Diigo Post to Facebook Post to Google Buzz

Abuse Of The Planning System

February 22nd, 2011

I read a news report today regarding an unscrupulous approach to members of the Lichfield District Council Planning Committee regarding the application underway for the construction of wind turbines near Lichfield.  I commented on the article that abuse of the planning procedures are nothing new and go on regularly.  The public at large only become aware of the abuses when they happen on their doorstep. A common abuse of the system involves the following:

  1. Build what you want.
  2. Get caught and served with enforcement notice(s).
  3. Apply for retrospective planning permission at the last minute.
  4. Appeal, again at the last minute after the application is rejected.
  5. Reach a compromise which would never have been accepted had you applied properly before construction/installation.

The whole process takes about two years, much more in the case of illegal traveller sites etc. As well as the attempted coercion of the planning committee in this case there are several others that I am aware of:

  • An illegal riding centre and stables, built without planning permission in Penkridge with no regard for neighbours rights. Retrospective planning permission was rejected by a government inspector, a revised application was made and recommended by council officers (foolishly, in my opinion) but rejected by committee. At the time of that report the council were still looking for a ‘compromise’.  There should be no compromise.  It was built without permission, knock it down!
  • The ‘V N Best’ shop in Burntwood installed galvanised steel external roller shutters in front of the building line without permission in October 2009.  After warnings from the council, they applied for retrospective planning permission in April 2010.  It was refused in June 2010 and enforcement notices followed.  There is a period of 6 months allowed to file an appeal.  The appeal was filed the day before the 6 months ran out and is now ongoing, a decision not being expected until the end of March, eighteen months on and with the likelihood of further enforcement notices to follow.
  • ‘A & J Vehicle Repairs’ in New Road, Burntwood is a repeat offender.  Looking through Burntwood Town Council Planning Committee minutes you will find ongoing issues with carrying out business ventures without applying for permission and they were recently prosecuted and fined for running an illegal caravan site from the premises, a process which took 14 years!

I think the cases which are clearly just playing the system need a harder line and the idea that building first and asking permission afterwards is a route to a compromise should be quashed completely.

Post to Twitter Post to Bebo Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Diigo Post to Facebook Post to Google Buzz

Illegal Caravan Site in Burntwood

January 20th, 2011

A burntwood man, Jim Horton of Rake Hill, has been prosecuted for running a caravan site on land at A & J vehicles in New Road without a license.  He has run the site at the back of industrial units since 1996 and continued after a warning from Lichfield District Council in 2007.

I have been aware of complaints regarding the multiple uses of the site from council minutes, but the timescale required to bring an illegal activity under control is staggering!  Eleven years for the council to issue a warning (granted I don’t know when it was first brought to the Coucil’s attention), a further 3.5 years to prosecute and how long will the enforcement action take following the successful prosecution?

I think the planning control and enforcement procedures in the UK need tightening up.  It’s OK having rules about what can and cannot be done with a property or business but if the rules are repeatedly ignored, something needs to be done a lot quicker than 14 years!

Post to Twitter Post to Bebo Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Diigo Post to Facebook Post to Google Buzz

Dominos Pizza in Burntwood

September 13th, 2010

Planning approval has been given to convert the ex China Chef take-away on the High Street in Chasetown into a Domino’s Pizza take-away.  No current date has been give for it to open but the refurbishment wouldn’t take long I wouldn’t have thought.  It will probably do very well as Dominos has been one of the star performers during the recession.

Post to Twitter Post to Bebo Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Diigo Post to Facebook Post to Google Buzz