Archive for the ‘Licensing’ category

Petrol Station Or Shop?

October 20th, 2011

 

 

 

I’ve had some interest this week here and on Twitter regarding the apparent nationwide side-stepping by Shell of Section 176 of the licensing act which is designed to prevent petrol stations from selling alcohol.  It seems that Shell are applying for premises licenses at a number of UK sites using the argument that their petrol stations are actually shops which happen to sell petrol.   A recent application in Lichfield was granted, as was one in Portsmouth and an application in Pool-in-Wharfedale, is being opposed by police.

Shell are arguing, using Barristers at the committee meetings that their petrol stations are actually primarily convenience stores where sales, measured either by turnover or profit (whichever suits the situation it seems) are higher on non-fuel than they are on fuel.  The committees are then reminded that in the event of a refusal, Shell will appeal to a Magistrates Court and then, if necessary, to the high court, all at the potential cost to the council and hence the taxpayer.

A case in the high court, Murco Petroleum Limited v Bristol City Council clarified the fact that regardless of these sales figures and calculations, the decision regarding the primary business of the premises still rests with the Licensing Committee.

What Shell are doing is not illegal under the current legislation as “As a matter of law, trading figures can be used to determine the issue of primary use under Section 176 (Green v the Justices for Inner London). ” (Quoted from the Walker Morris article linked to above), however it appears, in my opinion at least, to be bullying councils with the threat of huge legal costs if they don’t get their way.

On a side note, if the sale of fuel is so unprofitable for Shell, and selling booze is so important to them, perhaps they’d be better off running a chain of corner shops instead?

I’ve posted a couple of press cuttings after the break for anyone who’s interested in the coverage of the Lichfield application.

» Read more: Petrol Station Or Shop?

Post to Twitter Post to Bebo Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Diigo Post to Facebook Post to Google Buzz

Round the Clock Alcohol Application in Lichfield

June 24th, 2011

Lichfield residents around the Shell petrol station on Tamworth road are rightly concerned about an application to sell alcohol 24hrs a day from the station.  It’s a mainly residential area which has no need for every waif and stray in Lichfield descending on it in the early hours of every morning to buy and consume alcohol.  Most people like a drink, or several, but having someone serving it on your doorstep at all hours of the day is unacceptable.

I wish them luck with their fight, because it will be a fight.  I have first-hand experience of LDC’s Licensing Committee and found that they couldn’t care less about local objections and will probably be quite offended that these residents dare to make them sit on a committee and be forced to give them bad news.   Licensing Committees are there to make sure that licenses are granted wherever possible but they do have the power to refuse and refusals can and do stand up at appeal.  I believe our committee lacks the courage to use that power for the benefit of its residents since it is just easier to issue a license.

Post to Twitter Post to Bebo Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Diigo Post to Facebook Post to Google Buzz

Lichfield Council Backs Licensing Changes

October 1st, 2010

Following a Licensing Committee Meeting, Lichfield Council has given it’s backing to changes to the way in which alcohol licensing is managed, potentially giving more control to local authorities over when and where licences are issued.

Whilst I applaud any efforts to reduce the impact of alcohol on the area, I have some issues with what real changes the new guidelines would make.  For example:

It proposes to give licensing authorities the power to refuse applications without requiring representations from a responsible authority’, and ‘reduce the evidential burden of proof required by licensing authorities in making their decisions’.

A local authority can already refuse a license without requiring representations from police, trading standards etc.  Of course it is easier to make a refusal with their support but it is not a requirement.  An appeal involving Thwaites vs Wirrall (and a subsequent amendment to the government guidelines)  made clear that, although there is a burden of evidence required, licensing sub-committees, particularly for new premises where there is no history,  have powers to conclude, that there is a very real threat of the fears or the dangers being described actually occurring.  In other words, they do not need a long list of past incidents to refuse a license, they can base their judgment on the potential for problems.

The Government also plans to increase the input of local residents in licensing decisions, introduce tougher sentences for persistent underage sales and ban the sale of alcohol below cost price.

From my experience of the licensing committee for Lichfield, they would need to first learn how to listen to residents in the first place, let alone try to imagine themselves in their situation.  Sentencing for underage sales first requires Trading Standards to monitor and enforce existing rules which I have not witnessed much enthusiasm for.

Above all, even with the changes the government are proposing, the focus of the Licensing Act and it’s operation fail to acknowledge the different issues relating to pub/club licensing and off-licensing.  An application in a town centre where policing is available and issues are concentrated on non-residential areas needs a very different focus to that required by an off-license in a residential area.  Too much attention is paid to late-night binge drinking in town centres where the focus is the protection of drinkers and property whereas the problems of under-age drinking and public nuisance is really the realm of the off-license where it is much more difficult to police.

To be blunt, it’s fine giving local authorities more powers but they still need the balls to use them.

Post to Twitter Post to Bebo Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Diigo Post to Facebook Post to Google Buzz

Diamond Snooker Centre Loses Licence.

July 28th, 2010

Taken from Staffordshire Police:

The decision to revoke the licence at the Diamond Snooker Centre in Bridge Cross Road, was taken after Lichfield District councillors heard evidence from police officers who launched an investigation following complaints.

PC Steve Williams, a member of Trent Valley police’s licensing unit, told the council’s licensing and consents appeal committee, police had gathered evidence of criminal activities at the premises.

This included evidence of violence, disorder, drunkenness and the use of controlled substances by persons in charge of the premises, he explained.

“Having listened to the community and local officers, we launched an investigation which resulted in the premises being issued last May with a closure notice under Section 19 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 along with a review of the premises licence,” PC Williams explained after the hearing.

“Our enquiries revealed that alongside criminal activities, the venue had begun to impact on the quality of life and the trading practices of other premises in the area.

“The licensing committee formed the opinion that the premises had deteriorated to such a level, they agreed with the police application and revoked the premises licence.

“This means that there is no longer a licence in force which allows for the sale of alcohol or any licensable activity to take place on the premises.”

Post to Twitter Post to Bebo Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Diigo Post to Facebook Post to Google Buzz

Licensing Laws To Be Tightened

July 28th, 2010

As promised, the government is to completely review the 24-hour licensing regime.  In the BBC article this morning, Home Secretary Theresa May is quoted as saying

The system need to be rebalanced in favour of local communities.

Unfortunately, many of the proposals seem targeted at city centre pubs and clubs instead of anti-social behaviour in the community at large.  However there are signs that more power and sway will be given to local residents, including a widening of the “vicinity” from which objections to licensed activity can be accepted.

Maybe we will have enough change that anyone cannot open licensed premises anywhere they like without severe scrutiny.  Whether the authorities like it or not, the sale of alcohol to elements of the population brings serious problems to others.  The balance is currently completely wrong and any attempt to re-balance the power towards the community  has my support.

I do not, however, agree with minimum pricing for alcohol or heavy-handed policies with respect to pricing.  For every person abusing alcohol there are hundreds enjoying it in moderation as part of their everyday life.  Why should they be made to pay more in a futile attempt to control the minority through pricing?

Post to Twitter Post to Bebo Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Diigo Post to Facebook Post to Google Buzz